4.8 Article

Early Fate Defines Microglia and Non-parenchymal Brain Macrophage Development

Journal

CELL
Volume 181, Issue 3, Pages 557-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P3_170626, BSGI0_155832, 310030_146130, 316030_150768, 310030_170320]
  2. ERC Consolidator Grants [918229, NImO 616080]
  3. Singapore Immunology Network (SIgN)
  4. Singapore National Research Foundation Senior Investigatorship (NRFI) [NRF2016NRF-NRFI001-02]
  5. INSERM
  6. CNRS
  7. [ANR-10-INBS-04]
  8. [ANR-10-LABX-54 MEMO LIFE]
  9. [ANR-11-IDEX-000-02]
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P3_170626] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Central nervous system (CNS) macrophages comprise microglia and border-associated macrophages (BAMs) residing in the meninges, the choroid plexus, and the perivascular spaces. Most CNS macrophages emerge during development, with the exception of choroid plexus and dural macrophages, which are replaced by monocytes in adulthood. Whether microglia and BAMs share a developmental program or arise from separate lineages remains unknown. Here, we identified two phenotypically, transcriptionally, and locally distinct brain macrophages throughout development, giving rise to either microglia or BAMs. Two macrophage populations were already present in the yolk sac suggesting an early segregation. Fate-mapping models revealed that BAMs mostly derived from early erythro-myeloid progenitors in the yolk sac. The development of microglia was dependent on TGF-beta, whereas the genesis of BAMs occurred independently of this cytokine. Collectively, our data show that developing parenchymal and non-parenchymal brain macrophages are separate entities in terms of ontogeny, gene signature, and requirement for TGF-beta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available