4.8 Article

Targeting Aquaporin-4 Subcellular Localization to Treat Central Nervous System Edema

Journal

CELL
Volume 181, Issue 4, Pages 784-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.037

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology & Biosciences Research Council [BB/P025927/1]
  2. Aston University
  3. Biogen
  4. International Spinal Research Trust [NRB116]
  5. Saudi Education Ministry in London [SHU11]
  6. Swedish Research Council [2013-05945]
  7. Crafoord Foundation [20140811, 20180916]
  8. Magnus Bergvall Foundation [2015-01534]
  9. Knut and Alice Wallenburg Foundation
  10. Lundbeck Foundation
  11. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  12. BBSRC [BB/P025927/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Swedish Research Council [2013-05945] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Swelling of the brain or spinal cord (CNS edema) affects millions of people every year. All potential pharmacological interventions have failed in clinical trials, meaning that symptom management is the only treatment option. The water channel protein aquaporin-4 (AQP4) is expressed in astrocytes and mediates water flux across the blood-brain and blood-spinal cord barriers. Here we show that AQP4 cell-surface abundance increases in response to hypoxia-induced cell swelling in a calmodulin-dependent manner. Calmodulin directly binds the AQP4 carboxyl terminus, causing a specific conformational change and driving AQP4 cell-surface localization. Inhibition of calmodulin in a rat spinal cord injury model with the licensed drug trifluoperazine inhibited AQP4 localization to the blood-spinal cord barrier, ablated CNS edema, and led to accelerated functional recovery compared with untreated animals. We propose that targeting the mechanism of calmodulin-mediated cell-surface localization of AQP4 is a viable strategy for development of CNS edema therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available