4.5 Article

Statins use and its impact in EGFR-TKIs resistance to prolong the survival of lung cancer patients: A Cancer registry cohort study in Taiwan

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 111, Issue 8, Pages 2965-2973

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.14493

Keywords

EGFR-TKIs resistance; lung cancer; statins related mortality; synergistic anticancer; Taiwan cancer registry

Categories

Funding

  1. Taipei Medical University [TMU107-AE1-B18, MOST 108-2410-H-038-010-SSS, MOST 109-2222-E-038-002-MY2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Statins have been shown to be a beneficial treatment as chemotherapy and target therapy for lung cancer. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of statins in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for the resistance and mortality of lung cancer patients. A population-based cohort study was conducted using the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. From January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2012, in total 792 non-statins and 41 statins users who had undergone EGFR-TKIs treatment were included in this study. All patients were monitored until the event of death or when changed to another therapy. Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate overall survival. We found that the mortality was significantly lower in patients in the statins group compared with patients in the non-statins group (4-y cumulative mortality, 77.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 36.6%-81.4% vs. 85.5%; 95% CI, 78.5%-98%;P = .004). Statin use was associated with a reduced risk of death in patients the group who had tumor sizes <3 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51, 95% CI, 0.29-0.89) and for patients in the group who had CCI scores <3 (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.41-0.88;P = .009). In our study, statins were found to be associated with prolonged survival time in patients with lung cancer who were treated with EGFR-TKIs and played a synergistic anticancer role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available