4.8 Article

ERRα Expression in Bone Metastases Leads to an Exacerbated Antitumor Immune Response

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 80, Issue 13, Pages 2914-2926

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-3584

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS)
  2. National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM)
  3. University of Lyon1, La Ligue Nationale
  4. Inserm-Transfert
  5. La Ligue Nationale contre le cancer labellisation EL2016
  6. French National Cancer Institute (INCa)
  7. Labex DEVweCAN [ANR-10LABX-61]
  8. La Ligue Nationale contre le cancer
  9. Marie-Curie-Individual-Fellowship [655777miROMeS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone is the most common metastatic site for breast cancer. Although the estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERR alpha) has been implicated in breast cancer cell dissemination to the bone from the primary tumor, its role after tumor cell anchorage in the bone microenvironment remains elusive. Here, we reveal that ERR alpha inhibits the progression of bone metastases of breast cancer cells by increasing the immune activity of the bone microenvironment. Overexpression of ERR alpha in breast cancer bone metastases induced expression of chemokines CCL17 and CCL20 and repressed production of TGF beta 3. Subsequently, CD8(+) T lymphocytes recruited to bone metastases escaped TGF beta signaling control and were endowed with exacerbated cytotoxic features, resulting in significant reduction in metastases. The clinical relevance of our findings in mice was confirmed in over 240 patients with breast cancer. Thus, this study reveals that ERR alpha regulates immune properties in the bone microenvironment that contributes to decreasing metastatic growth. Significance This study places ERR alpha at the interplay between the immune response and bone metastases of breast cancer, highlighting a potential target for intervention in advanced disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available