4.7 Article

HMGB1 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation via interacting with GPX4 in colon cancer cells

Journal

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01289-6

Keywords

HMGB1; GPX4; p-p65; ROS; Inflammation; Colon cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Scientific Research Foundation of Collaborative Innovation Center of Elderly Care and Health [YLZBZ1504]
  2. Application and Basic Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2017JY0166]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Chengdu Medical College [CYZ18-17/CYCG17-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Inflammation is one of a main reason for colon cancer progression and poor prognosis. The high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) are responsible for inflammation, but the relationship between HMGB1 and GPX4 remains unknown about inflammation in colon cancer. Methods: RT-qPCR was carried out to investigate the expression of IL1 beta, IL6 and TNF alpha in colon cancer cells stimulated with LPS or siHMGB1. To observe the relationship between HMGB1, GPX4 and inflammation or ROS, Western blot assays were adopted. Pull-down, CoIP and immunohistochemistry assays were performed to further investigate the molecular mechanisms of HMGB1 and GPX4 in colon cancer. Results: We report that HMGB1 mediates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation in colon cancer cells. Mechanistically, acetylated HMGB1 interacts with GPX4, negatively regulating GPX4 activity. Furthermore, by utilizing siHMGB1 and its inhibitor, our discoveries demonstrate that HMGB1 knockdown can inhibit inflammation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation via NF-kB. Conclusion: Collectively, our findings first demonstrate that acetylated HMGB1 can interact with GPX4, leading to inflammation, and providing therapeutic strategies targeting HMGB1 and GPX4 for colon cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available