4.7 Review

Breast cancer treatment: A phased approach to implementation

Journal

CANCER
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 2365-2378

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32910

Keywords

breast cancer; cancer center of excellence; centralized care; decentralized care; dissemination and implementation science; early diagnosis; health disparities; low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); multidisciplinary evaluation; phased implementation; resource-stratification; supportive and palliative care; treatment; underserved communities

Categories

Funding

  1. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  3. US National Institutes of Health [1R13CA224776-01A1]
  4. National Cancer Institute Center for Global Health
  5. American Society of Clinical Oncology
  6. National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc
  7. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
  8. Union for International Cancer Control
  9. University of Washington Department of Global Health
  10. Cepheid, Inc
  11. GE Healthcare
  12. Novartis
  13. Pfizer, Inc
  14. UE LifeSciences
  15. Susan G. Komen Leadership Grant [SAC170082]
  16. Susan G. Komen [GSP18BHGI001]
  17. American Society for Clinical Pathology
  18. Journal of Global Oncology
  19. pH Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optimal treatment outcomes for breast cancer are dependent on a timely diagnosis followed by an organized, multidisciplinary approach to care. However, in many low- and middle-income countries, effective care management pathways can be difficult to follow because of financial constraints, a lack of resources, an insufficiently trained workforce, and/or poor infrastructure. On the basis of prior work by the Breast Health Global Initiative, this article proposes a phased implementation strategy for developing sustainable approaches to enhancing patient care in limited-resource settings by creating roadmaps that are individualized and adapted to the baseline environment. This strategy proposes that, after a situational analysis, implementation phases begin with bolstering palliative care capacity, especially in settings where a late-stage diagnosis is common. This is followed by strengthening the patient pathway, with consideration given to a dynamic balance between centralization of services into centers of excellence to achieve better quality and decentralization of services to increase patient access. The use of resource checklists ensures that comprehensive therapy or palliative care can be delivered safely and effectively. Episodic or continuous monitoring with established process and quality metrics facilitates ongoing assessment, which should drive continual process improvements. A series of case studies provides a snapshot of country experiences with enhancing patient care, including the implementation of national cancer control plans in Kenya, palliative care in Romania, the introduction of a 1-stop clinic for diagnosis in Brazil, the surgical management of breast cancer in India, and the establishment of a women's cancer center in Ghana.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available