4.4 Article

Dynamics of fine-root production and mortality of Scots pine in waterlogged peat soil during the growing season

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 510-518

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2019-0163

Keywords

carbon sequestration; growth; forest hydrology; hypoxia; phenology; survival analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) [41007-00004000]
  2. Academy of Finland [311455]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [311455, 311455] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Excess water in the rooting zone critically reduces tree growth and may even kill trees; however, the relative importance of damage to roots versus aboveground parts and the time course of damage are not well understood. We studied the dynamics of fine-root growth and mortality of 7-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) saplings affected by a 5-week period of waterlogging (WL) during the growing season. Two out of six WL-exposed saplings survived the treatment. After 1-2 weeks of WL, the mortality of the first-order short roots (usually mycorrhizas) started to increase and the production of these roots started to decrease. WL decreased the longevity of short and long roots. Total root length (especially of fine roots with a diameter < 0.5 mm), specific fine-root length, total root dry mass (including stump), and reverse-flow root hydraulic conductance were lower in WL saplings than in control saplings at the end of the experiment; however, several root traits were similar in control and surviving WL saplings. Because of the high importance of fine roots for tree growth and carbon sequestration, their responses to elevated water tables should be considered in sustainable use and management of boreal peatland forests, for example, by continuous cover forestry and (or) ditch network maintenance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available