4.6 Article

Real-world tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment pathways, monitoring patterns and responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in the United Kingdom: the UK TARGET CML study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 192, Issue 1, Pages 62-74

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16733

Keywords

tyrosine kinase inhibitor; chronic myeloid leukaemia; real-world study; molecular response; CML management

Categories

Funding

  1. OPEN VIE
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd.
  4. MRC [MC_PC_17230, G84/6443, MC_UU_12009/16, MR/L006340/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has evolved significantly, but real-world data shows discrepancies with ELN recommendations. Molecular assessments are often missed, some patients do not switch TKI despite treatment failure, and cardiovascular risk factors are not consistently considered during TKI management. Different TKIs have varying effects on achieving major and deep molecular responses, highlighting the need for improvement in caring for CML patients.
Management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has recently undergone dramatic changes, prompting the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) to issue recommendations in 2013; however, it remains unclear whether real-world CML management is consistent with these goals. We report results of UK TARGET CML, a retrospective observational study of 257 patients with chronic-phase CML who had been prescribed a first-line TKI between 2013 and 2017, most of whom received first-line imatinib (n = 203). Although 44% of patients required >= 1 change of TKI, these real-world data revealed that molecular assessments were frequently missed, 23% of patients with ELN-defined treatment failure did not switch TKI, and kinase domain mutation analysis was performed in only 49% of patients who switched TKI for resistance. Major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL1(IS) <= 0 center dot 1%) and deep molecular response (DMR; BCR-ABL1(IS) <= 0 center dot 01%) were observed in 50% and 29%, respectively, of patients treated with first-line imatinib, and 63% and 54%, respectively, receiving a second-generation TKI first line. MMR and DMR were also observed in 77% and 44% of evaluable patients with >= 13 months follow-up, receiving a second-generation TKI second line. We found little evidence that cardiovascular risk factors were considered during TKI management. These findings highlight key areas for improvement in providing optimal care to patients with CML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available