4.6 Review

Global evidence on occupational sun exposure and keratinocyte cancers: a systematic review

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 184, Issue 2, Pages 208-218

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19152

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. International League of Dermatological Societies (ILDS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies have shown a potential association between occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation and the development of keratinocyte cancers in populations of European ancestry living in the Americas, Europe, and Oceania. However, not all studies have found a significant increase in risk, indicating the need for well-designed and adequately powered research to accurately assess the risk of occupational KC.
Individual studies have suggested that the association between occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and the development of keratinocyte cancers (KCs) may only be valid in populations of European ancestry living in certain geographical regions. Comparative global data are scarce and so this review aimed to summarize current evidence on the association between occupational exposure to solarUVRand the development ofKCs, with a specific focus on geographical location and skin colour. OvidMEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for potentially relevant records. Extracted data were summarized by study, country and region. We included one prospective cohort study and 18 case-control studies (n= 15 233) from 12 countries in regions where the majority of the population is white skinned (Americas, Europe and Oceania). Eighteen of the 19 studies reported effect estimates suggesting an increased risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and/or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) among outdoor workers. Only 11 studies found a significantly increased risk and many had imprecise estimates. There was a significantly increased risk ofBCCandSCCin individual studies in North America, Latin America and the Caribbean, Western Europe and Southern Europe, but not across regions or countries. Overall, 95% of studies reported higher risks among outdoor workers, although the increases in risk were statistically significant in just over half of the studies. Well-designed and sufficiently powered occupational case-control and cohort studies with adequate adjustment for confounding factors and other risk factors are required to provide more accurate risk estimates for occupationalKC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available