4.7 Article

A common polymorphism in the retinoic acid pathway modifies adrenocortical carcinoma age-dependent incidence

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 122, Issue 8, Pages 1231-1241

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0764-3

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  2. Conselho National de Desenvolvimento e Pesquisa (CNPq)
  3. Comissao de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES)
  4. CNRS EXPOGEN-CANCER
  5. International Associated Laboratory (LIA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have enriched the fields of genomics and drug development. Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer with a bimodal age distribution and inadequate treatment options. Paediatric ACC is frequently associated with TP53 mutations, with particularly high incidence in Southern Brazil due to the TP53 p.R337H (R337H) germline mutation. The heterogeneous risk among carriers suggests other genetic modifiers could exist. Methods We analysed clinical, genotype and gene expression data derived from paediatric ACC, R337H carriers, and adult ACC patients. We restricted our analyses to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously identified in GWASs to associate with disease or human traits. Results A SNP, rs971074, in the alcohol dehydrogenase 7 gene significantly and reproducibly associated with allelic differences in ACC age-of-onset in both cohorts. Patients homozygous for the minor allele were diagnosed up to 16 years earlier. This SNP resides in a gene involved in the retinoic acid (RA) pathway and patients with differing levels of RA pathway gene expression in their tumours associate with differential ACC progression. Conclusions These results identify a novel genetic component to ACC development that resides in the retinoic acid pathway, thereby informing strategies to develop management, preventive and therapeutic treatments for ACC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available