4.5 Article

Rituximab for desensitization during HLA-mismatched stem cell transplantation in patients with a positive donor-specific anti-HLA antibody

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 55, Issue 7, Pages 1326-1336

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-020-0928-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0104500]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z181100009618032]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470342]
  4. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [81230013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To define the efficacy of a single dose of 375 mg/m(2) rituximab for DSA-positive patients with 2000 <= MFI < 10,000, we enrolled a prospective clinical cohort including patients with positive DSA treated with rituximab (n = 55, cohort A), a matched-pair cohort including cases with negative DSA (n = 110, cohort B) and a historical cohort including subjects with 2000 <= MFI < 10,000 without receiving any treatment for DSA (n = 22, cohort C). The incidences of primary poor graft function (PGF) in cohort A and cohort B were 5% and 1% (P = 0.076), respectively, both of which were lower than that in cohort C (27%, P < 0.001, for all). Rituximab was associated with a reduced incidence of primary PGF (HR 0.200, P = 0.023). The 3-year nonrelapse mortality of patients in cohort A and cohort B were 23% and 24%, respectively, both of which were lower than that in the cohort C (37%), although no statistical significance was observed. These results led to a low 3-year overall survival in patients in the cohort C (58%) compared with those in the cohort A (71%) and the cohort B (73%). We suggest that a single dose of rituximab could be effectively used to prevent the onset of primary PGF. The prospective cohort of this study is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR-OPC-15006672..

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available