4.7 Article

The impact of manure, straw and biochar amendments on aggregation and erosion in a hillslope Ultisol

Journal

CATENA
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 30-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.11.008

Keywords

Aggregate stability; Biochar; Organic amendment; Soil erosion; Soil structure

Funding

  1. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2011BAD31B04]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371235]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil erosion is a serious problem in subtropical China where hillslope red soils (Ultisols in US soil taxonomy) are intensively cultivated. Manure and amendments have been reported to improve crop growth and soil structural stability in long-term experiments so the objective of this study was to determine the effect of different organic amendments on soil aggregate stability, agronomic performance, runoff, and erosion. Four treatments consisted of inorganic NPK fertilizer (NPK), NPK fertilizer plus rice straw mulch (NPK + Str), NPK fertilizer plus rice straw derived biochar (NPK + BC), and NPK fertilizer plus swine manure (NPK + OM) located on land with a 9-14% slope planted with peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). During the peanut season, soil erosion ranged from around 2600 ton km(-2) with just inorganic NPK fertilizer down to 627 ton km(-2) with fertilizer plus swine manure, while addition of swine manure also increased the above-ground biomass and SOC (P < 0.05). In contrast, rice straw-derived biochar did not improve soil acidity, crop growth, and aggregation (P > 0.05) except the SOC, because biochar was susceptible to erosion (2115 ton km(-2)). The least erosion was observed in the straw mulch treatment (225 ton km(-2)), while it improved the above-ground biomass (P < 0.05) but not the C stock. The results indicated that the application of organic manure was a more appropriate practice for hillslope Ultisols management than using biochar. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available