4.7 Article

Soil erosion risk associated with climate change at Mantaro River basin, Peruvian Andes

Journal

CATENA
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 110-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.07.003

Keywords

Soil erosion and degradation; Global warming; Tropical Andes; Soil erosion risk; GIS

Funding

  1. FAPEMIG [588 - CAG PPM - 00132/14, PPM VIII - 71-14]
  2. CNPq (PEC-PG)
  3. CNPq [303059/2013-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil degradation by water erosion has been accelerated by human activities. This process is aggravated in the Andes region due to steep slopes, sparse vegetation cover, and sporadic but high intensity rainfall, which together with a shallow soil depth, increases soil erosion risk. The objective of this study was to analyze the soil erosion risk, associated with A1B climate change scenario over the twenty-first century, for the Mantaro River basin (MRB), Peruvian Andes. The temporal analyses revealed maintenance of current soil erosion risk along the twenty-first century in almost all the MRB, whose current risk is either very severe or extremely severe. At the sub basin level, for those located in the center and northern MRB, progressive increases were observed in the average erosion rate by the end of this century, increasing the soil erosion risk. In sub-basins under greater influence of the Andes, this risk was classified as moderate and remained this way throughout the century, despite the increase in rainfall erosive potential simulated for these. In annual terms, there was a significant trend of decreasing rainfall erosivity and increasing the concentration of rainfall simulated based on A1B climate change scenario. Because the A1B scenario affects rainfall erosivity mainly during the rainy season, this causes a risk to the environmental sustainability and future agricultural activities. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available