Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The Internal Validity of Discrete Choice Experiment Data: A Testing Tool for Quantitative Assessments
F. Reed Johnson et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2019)
Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial
Richard M. Martin et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)
Screening for Prostate Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
David C. Grossman et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)
Values and preferences of men for undergoing prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: a systematic review
Robin W. M. Vernooij et al.
BMJ OPEN (2018)
Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Ilya Ivlev et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2018)
What is an acceptable false negative rate in the detection of prostate cancer?
Jan F. M. Verbeek et al.
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY (2018)
Men's perspectives of prostate cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies
Laura J. James et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Dawn Stacey et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2017)
Reconciling the Effects of Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality in the ERSPC and PLCO Trials
Alex Tsodikov et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2017)
Survey of public definitions of the term 'overdiagnosis' in the UK
Alex Ghanouni et al.
BMJ OPEN (2016)
General Practitioners' Experiences of, and Responses to, Uncertainty in Prostate Cancer Screening: Insights from a Qualitative Study
Kristen Pickles et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
To Screen or Not to Screen: What Factors Influence Complex Screening Decisions?
Dafina Petrova et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED (2016)
Enhancing Knowledge, Beliefs, and Intention to Screen for Prostate Cancer via Different Health Educational Interventions: a Literature Review
Ahmad M Saleh et al.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (2015)
Impact of a printed decision aid on patients' intention to undergo prostate cancer screening: a multicentre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
Viet-Thi Tran et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE (2015)
Men's preferences and trade-offs for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment
Kirsten Howard et al.
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS (2015)
Public Opinions about Overdiagnosis: A National Community Survey
Ray Moynihan et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up
Fritz H. Schroder et al.
LANCET (2014)
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
Michael D. Clark et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2014)
Risk as an Attribute in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Mark Harrison et al.
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2014)
Videos to influence: a systematic review of effectiveness of video-based education in modifying health behaviors
William Tuong et al.
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE (2014)
Influence of Study Features and Methods on Overdiagnosis Estimates in Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening
Ruth Etzioni et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2013)
Men's preferences for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment
E. W. de Bekker-Grob et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2013)
Conceptual, Methodological, and Ethical Problems in Communicating Uncertainty in Clinical Evidence
Paul K. J. Han
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW (2013)
Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force
F. Reed Johnson et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2013)
Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
Jolyn Hersch et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
Impact of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Terminology on Patient Treatment Preferences
Zehra B. Omer et al.
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2013)
Comparing 3 Techniques for Eliciting Patient Values for Decision Making About Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening A Randomized Controlled Trial
Michael Patrick Pignone et al.
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2013)
Screening for prostate cancer
Dragan Ilic et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2013)
False-positive screening results in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer
Thomas P. Kilpelainen et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2011)
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
John F. P. Bridges et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2011)
The effect of information on preferences stated in a choice-based conjoint analysis
J. A. van Til et al.
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING (2009)
The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices
Sarah T. Hawley et al.
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING (2008)
A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures
Arne Risa Hole
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2007)
Share Paper
