4.7 Article

Evaluation of a combined spatial multi-criteria evaluation model and deterministic model for landslide susceptibility mapping

Journal

CATENA
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 125-139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.01.022

Keywords

Combined model; Deokjeok-ri Creek; GIS; Landslide susceptibility; SHALSTAB; SMCE

Funding

  1. Public Welfare and Safety Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [2012M3A2A1050977]
  2. Smart Civil Infrastructure Research Program - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) of Korea government [13SCIPS04]
  3. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA)
  4. Brain Korea 21 Plus (BK 21 Plus)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M3A2A1050977] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the application of a combined spatial multi-criteria evaluation model and deterministic model for landslide susceptibility mapping in Deokjeok-ri Creek, located in the northeastern part of Korea. This region has frequent shallow landslides often caused by intense rainfall on weathered granite soil slopes. This study compared the predictive capability of two different models: a spatial multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) model, which is a semi-quantitative model, and a shallow landslide stability (SHALSTAB) model, which is a deterministic model used to produce shallow landslide susceptibility maps. For the SMCE model, input layers of landslide causative factors (i.e., topographic, hydrological; soil, forest, and geological factors) were prepared for pairwise comparison to obtain susceptibility weightage. For SHALSTAB, a digital elevation model was used to calculate slope and wetness indices. Field inventories were used to validate and combine the two models. A comparison of the susceptibility map obtained from the SMCE method with that obtained with the SHALSTAB method revealed that the total mismatch area between the two maps for all three susceptibility classes was about 53%. Therefore, the two results were combined to improve the reliability of the susceptibility map. The performance of the combined map was determined using the receiver operator curve (ROC). The area under curve (AUC) revealed a success accuracy of 79.56%, and the predictive accuracy was 83.6%. These results demonstrate that the combined model was more accurate than either individual model at delineating landslide-prone areas of weathered granite soil slopes. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available