4.7 Article

Simulation of field-measured soil loss in Mediterranean hilly areas (Chianti, Italy) with RUSLE

Journal

CATENA
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages 246-256

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.018

Keywords

Soil erosion; Rainfall erosivity; RUSLE; C-factor; IS-factor; Soil conservation

Funding

  1. Chianti: Barberino Val d'Elsa
  2. Castellina in Chianti
  3. Castelnuovo Berardenga
  4. Gaiole in Chianti
  5. Greve in Chianti
  6. Radda in Chianti
  7. San Casciano in Val di Pesa
  8. Tavarnelle Val di Pesa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The issue of soil erosion is considered highly important by local administrators of the Chianti region. Thus, a methodology for predicting the long-term average annual soil loss, by using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) in a Geographical Information System framework was developed and assessed. The rainfall and runoff erosivity factor was calculated using 35 raingauges with an acquisition interval of 15 min in the period from 1996 to 2010. The soil erodibility factor was estimated using a soil map at a scale of 1:50,000. The topographic factor was calculated from a 10 m digital elevation model. Moreover, a methodology was proposed that took into account the vineyard row direction and slope. Soil loss field data (566 field sites) were measured over 6 years using a topographical approach, and used to validate the model results. The statistical indices for the evaluation of the model were, respectively, the mean percent error (M%E), -0.1%, the ratio of the RMSE to the standard deviation of the observations (RSR), 23.7%; and the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NCS), 0.9. Statistics indicated good predictions of long-term average annual soil losses at a field scale. The average annual soil loss for the study area was predicted up to 6.4 t.ha(-1).y(-1). Approximately 13% of the study area was classified as high erosion (>= 22 t.ha(-1).y(-1)). The identification of areas with the greatest erosion risk supports the possibility of using the model for land-use and land-management planning purposes. Moreover, this assists in the identification of those areas towards which conservation measures can be directed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available