4.6 Article

Fast tree aggregation for consensus hierarchical clustering

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-3453-6

Keywords

Hierarchical clustering; Data integration; Unsupervised learning; Consensus clustering; Omics

Funding

  1. LabEx Saclay Plant Sciences-SPS [ANR-10-LABX-0040-SPS]
  2. ATIGE grant from Genopole

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In unsupervised learning and clustering, data integration from different sources and types is a difficult question discussed in several research areas. For instance in omics analysis, dozen of clustering methods have been developed in the past decade. When a single source of data is at play, hierarchical clustering (HC) is extremely popular, as a tree structure is highly interpretable and arguably more informative than just a partition of the data. However, applying blindly HC to multiple sources of data raises computational and interpretation issues. Results: We propose mergeTrees, a method that aggregates a set of trees with the same leaves to create a consensus tree. In our consensus tree, a cluster at height h contains the individuals that are in the same cluster for all the trees at height h. The method is exact and proven to be O(nq log(n)), n being the individuals and q being the number of trees to aggregate. Our implementation is extremely effective on simulations, allowing us to process many large trees at a time. We also rely on mergeTrees to perform the cluster analysis of two real-omics data sets, introducing a spectral variant as an efficient and robust by-product. Conclusions: Our tree aggregation method can be used in conjunction with hierarchical clustering to perform efficient cluster analysis. This approach was found to be robust to the absence of clustering information in some of the data sets as well as an increased variability within true clusters. The method is implemented in R/C++ and available as an R package named mergeTrees, which makes it easy to integrate in existing or new pipelines in several research areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available