4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical study on penetration-induced internal short-circuit of lithium-ion cell

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115082

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery safety; Nail penetration; Internal short-circuit; Thermal runaway

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0100306]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674228, 51976209]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2320000038]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2013286]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nail penetration test is an abuse test method to evaluate the thermal hazard of lithium-ion battery. The internal short-circuit is a direct cause of battery thermal runaway, while its mechanism has not been fully understood yet. In this work, the penetration-induced internal short-circuit of lithium-ion cell is studied through nail penetration experiments, numerical simulation, and cell separator thermal analysis. The results show that the nail plays a dual role in the penetration process for thermal runaway or non-thermal runaway cases, which determines the short-circuit current and heat dissipation. In addition, there are two types of temperature rise modes for thermal runaway case, the time intervals from the beginning of penetration to thermal runaway of these two modes are less than 5 s and 60 s, respectively. It can also be concluded that the cell terminal voltage is found to decay exponentially with time after penetration, while the fluctuations and rebound of terminal voltage during the nail penetration process are attributed to the partially interrupted internal short-circuit path. The results indicate that the Joule heat generated at short spot dominates the total heat generation inside lithium-ion cell with non-thermal runaway nail penetration cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available