4.7 Article

Prediction of corrosion inhibition efficiency of pyridines and quinolines on an iron surface using machine learning-powered quantitative structure-property relationships

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 512, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145612

Keywords

Corrosion inhibition; N-heterocycles; QSPR; DFT calculations; Machine learning; Adsorption energy

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore [R-143-000-B05-114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Linear and non-linear quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models were developed to predict corrosion inhibition efficiency for a series of 41 pyridine and quinoline N-heterocycles. Out of 20 physicochemical and quantum chemical variables related to the surface adsorption behaviour of the inhibitors, consensus models were constructed using the genetic algorithm-partial least squares (GA-PLS) and genetic algorithm-artificial neural network (GA-ANN) methods. The consensus GA-PLS model comprised of eight variables (exponential of the calculated adsorption energy, LUMO, van der Waals surface area and volume, polarizability, electron affinity, electrophilicity, electron donor capacity) exhibited an %RMSECV of 16.5% and mean %RMSE of 14.9%. Such a model moderately captured the complex relationships between inhibition efficiency and the quantum chemical variables. The consensus GA-ANN model comprised of nine input variables (exponential of the calculated adsorption energy, HOMO, LUMO, HOMO-LUMO Gap, electronegativity, softness, electrophilicity, electron donor capacity and N atomic charge) exhibited an %RMSECV of 16.7 +/- 2.3% and mean RMSE (training/testing/validation) of 8.8%, performing better than its linear counterpart in terms of predictive ability. Both models revealed the importance of adsorption to the metal surface, and electronic parameters quantifying electron acceptance/donation to/from the iron surface, suggesting key corrosion inhibition design principles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available