4.6 Article

Effects of particle size on catalytic conversion of ethanol to propylene over H-ZSM-5 catalysts-Smaller is better

Journal

CATALYSIS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 27-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2015.10.008

Keywords

Ethanol; Propylene; H-ZSM-5; Particle size

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21406269]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2014BQ012]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [K1504051C]
  4. Shandong Provincial Key Research Program [2015GSF121017]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [15CX05013A]
  6. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [sklssm201429]
  7. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Utilization of Forestry Biomass [2014lCUFB06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, H-ZSM-5 catalysts with different particle sizes were prepared by adding different amount of water to the starting gel before crystallization. These H-ZSM-5 catalysts were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, N-2 adsorption/desorption measurements, X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, and temperature programmed desorption of ammonia. It was found that the olefin (ethylene, propylene and butene) yield decreased with the increase in the particle size of the catalysts. The paraffin (ethane, propane and butane) yield trended to increase with the increase of particle size. The C-5 + products yield increased considerably with the increase of particle size. The results implied that the formation of the C-5 + products and hydrogen was inhibited over the smaller particle size catalyst, furthermore the formation of paraffin decreased. So the propylene yield could be increased over smaller H-ZSM-5 catalyst. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available