4.6 Article

A Simple Calibration Method of Anti-Stokes-Stokes Raman Intensity Ratios Using the Water Spectrum for Intracellular Temperature Measurements

Journal

APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 74, Issue 10, Pages 1295-1300

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0003702820933908

Keywords

Low-frequency Raman spectroscopy; molecular temperature; intensity calibration; intermolecular vibrations

Funding

  1. Yamada Science Foundation
  2. JST ERATO [JPMJER1502]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Presented here is a facile and practical method for calibrating anti-Stokes-Stokes intensity ratios in low-frequency Raman spectra that is devised specifically for temperature measurements inside cells. The proposed method uses as an intensity standard the low-frequency Raman spectrum of liquid water, a major molecular component of cells, whose temperature is independently measured with a thermocouple. Rather than calibrating pixel intensities themselves, we obtain a correction factor at each Raman shift in the 20-200 cm(-1)region by dividing the anti-Stokes-Stokes intensity ratio calculated theoretically from the Boltzmann factor at the known temperature by that obtained experimentally. The validity of the correction curve so obtained is confirmed by measuring water at other temperatures. The anti-Stokes-Stokes intensity ratios that have been subjected to our calibration are well fitted with the Boltzmann factor within similar to 1% errors and yield water temperatures in fairly good agreement with the thermocouple temperature (an average difference similar to 1 celcius). The present method requires only 15 min of spectral acquisition time for calibration, which is 50 times shorter than that in a recently reported calibration method using the pure rotational Raman spectrum of N-2. We envision that it will be an effective asset in Raman thermometry and its applications to cellular thermogenesis and thermoregulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available