4.6 Review Book Chapter

Mechanism of Action of TiO2: Recommendations to Reduce Uncertainties Related to Carcinogenic Potential

Journal

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-101419-100049

Keywords

TiO2; carcinogenicity; mechanism of action; adverse outcome pathway; inhalation; oral exposure

Funding

  1. DutchMinistry of Infrastructure andWaterManagement
  2. DutchMinistry of Health, Welfare and Sport
  3. DutchMinistry of Social Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Risk Assessment Committee of the European Chemicals Agency has classified titanium dioxide as a suspected human carcinogen, particularly through inhalation exposure potentially causing lung tumors; there is uncertainty surrounding the carcinogenicity of TiO2, which may be reduced by clarifying its mechanism of action; collecting information on early KEs such as oxidative stress is recommended to decrease uncertainties regarding human relevance.
The Risk Assessment Committee of the European Chemicals Agency issued an opinion on classifying titanium dioxide (TiO2) as a suspected human carcinogen upon inhalation. Recent animal studies indicate that TiO2 may be carcinogenic through the oral route. There is considerable uncertainty on the carcinogenicity of TiO2, which may be decreased if its mechanism of action becomes clearer. Here we consider adverse outcome pathways and present the available information on each of the key events (KEs). Inhalation exposure to TiO2 can induce lung tumors in rats via a mechanism that is also applicable to other poorly soluble, low-toxicity particles. To reduce uncertainties regarding human relevance, we recommend gathering information on earlier KEs such as oxidative stress in humans. For oral exposure, insufficient information is available to conclude whether TiO2 can induce intestinal tumors. An oral carcinogenicity study with well-characterized (food-grade) TiO2 is needed, including an assessment of toxicokinetics and early KEs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available