4.6 Article

Engineering of high yield production of L-serine in Escherichia coli

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 807-816

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25844

Keywords

amino acids; E. coli; fermentation; L-serine production; L-serine toxicity; metabolic engineering

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  2. NNF Center for Biosustainability [Bacterial Cell Factory Optimization, iLoop] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF10CC1016517] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

L-serine is a widely used amino acid that has been proposed as a potential building block biochemical. The high theoretical yield from glucose makes a fermentation based production attractive. In order to achieve this goal, serine degradation to pyruvate and glycine in E. coli MG1655 was prevented by deletion of three L-serine deaminases sdaA, sdaB, and tdcG, as well as serine hydroxyl methyl transferase (SHMT) encoded by glyA. Upon overexpression of the serine production pathway, consisting of a feedback resistant version of serA along with serB and serC, this quadruple deletion strain showed a very high serine production yield (0.45g/g glucose) during small-scale batch fermentation in minimal medium. Serine, however, was found to be highly toxic even at low concentrations to this strain, which lead to slow growth and production during fed batch fermentation, resulting in a serine production of 8.3g/L. The production strain was therefore evolved by random mutagenesis to achieve increased tolerance towards serine. Additionally, overexpression of eamA, a cysteine/homoserine transporter was demonstrated to increase serine tolerance from 1.6g/L to 25g/L. During fed batch fermentation, the resulting strain lead to the serine production titer of 11.7g/L with yield of 0.43g/g glucose, which is the highest yield reported so far for any organism. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available