4.7 Article

Dengue NS1 detection in pediatric serum using microfluidic paper-based analytical devices

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 412, Issue 12, Pages 2915-2925

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-02527-6

Keywords

Dengue; NS1; Immunoassay; Human serum; Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices

Funding

  1. Universitas Islam Indonesia [scholarship research fund] Funding Source: Medline
  2. King Mongkut&apos
  3. s University of Technology Thonburi [KMUTT 55th Anniversary Commemorative Fund] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diagnosis of dengue infection is still a critical factor determining success in the clinical management and treatment of patients. Here, the development of microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (mu PADs) utilizing a sandwich immunoassay on wax patterned paper functionalized with anti-dengue NS1 monoclonal antibodies for point-of-care detection of dengue NS1 (DEN-NS1-PAD) is reported. Various assay conditions, including the length of the channel and diluent, were optimized, and the response detected by the naked eye and digitized images within 20-30 min. The DEN-NS1-PAD was successfully tested in the field for detecting dengue NS1 in buffer, cell culture media, and human serum. The limit of detection (LoD) of the DEN-NS1-PAD obtained with the naked eye, scanner, and a smartphone camera was 200, 46.7, and 74.8 ng mL(-1), respectively. The repeatability, reproducibility, and stability of the DEN-NS1-PAD were also evaluated. High true specificity and sensitivity in the serum of pediatric patients were observed. These evaluation results confirm that the DEN-NS1-PAD can potentially be used in point-of-care dengue diagnostics, which can significantly impact on the spreading of mosquito-borne diseases, which are likely to become more prevalent with the effects of global warming. Graphical

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available