4.7 Article

Identification of adulteration in botanical samples with untargeted metabolomics

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 412, Issue 18, Pages 4273-4286

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-02678-6

Keywords

Metabolomics; Goldenseal; Hydrastis canadensis; Mass spectrometry; Principal component analysis; Dietary supplements

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NIH NCCIH), Center of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research (NaPDI) [U54AT008909]
  2. Ruth L. Kirschstein Postdoctoral National Research Service Award [F32AT009816]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adulteration remains an issue in the dietary supplement industry, including botanical supplements. While it is common to employ a targeted analysis to detect known adulterants, this is difficult when little is known about the sample set. With this study, untargeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography coupled to ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (LC-UV) or high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was employed to detect adulteration in botanical dietary supplements. A training set was prepared by combining Hydrastis canadensis L. with a known adulterant, Coptis chinensis Franch., in ratios ranging from 5 to 95% adulteration. The metabolomics datasets were analyzed using both unsupervised (principal component analysis and composite score) and supervised (SIMCA) techniques. Palmatine, a known H. canadensis metabolite, was quantified as a targeted analysis comparison. While the targeted analysis was the most sensitive method tested in detecting adulteration, statistical analyses of the untargeted metabolomics datasets detected adulteration of the goldenseal samples, with SIMCA providing the greatest discriminating potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available