4.5 Review

Epidural vs. transversus abdominis plane block for abdominal surgery - a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Journal

ANAESTHESIA
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages 101-117

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/anae.15068

Keywords

abdominal surgery; abdominal wall blocks; analgesia; epidural analgesia; transversus abdominis plane block

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss Academy for Anaesthesia Research, Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [32003B_169974/1]
  3. B. Braun Medical AG
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [32003B_169974] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidural analgesia showed lower pain scores at rest at 12 hours compared to transversus abdominis plane block, but the quality of evidence was low. However, there was no difference at 24 hours. Epidural analgesia reduced the need for intravenous morphine-equivalent consumption, but also increased the risk of hypotension. Confidence in the evidence varied, creating uncertainty in the estimates when choosing between epidural analgesia and transversus abdominis plane block.
Traditionally, pain relief for abdominal surgery has centred on epidural analgesia, but transversus abdominis plane block is increasingly being used. Our aim was to compare the analgesic efficacy and the side-effect profile of transversus abdominis plane block with epidural analgesia in a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. After a systematic search of the electronic databases, we identified 18 randomised controlled trials with 1220 patients. Confirmed by trial sequential analysis, our first co-primary outcome, postoperative pain score at rest at 12 h, was decreased by a mean difference (95%CI) of 0.69 (0.12-1.27; p = 0.02) with epidural analgesia compared with transversus abdominis plane block, with the quality of evidence graded as low. No difference was found for the second co-primary outcome, postoperative pain score at rest at 24 h, with the quality of evidence rated as very low. Relative to transversus abdominis plane block, epidural analgesia further reduced the need for intravenous morphine-equivalent consumption during the 0-24 h interval by a mean difference (95%CI) of 5.91 mg (2.34-9.49; p = 0.001) at the expense of an increased incidence of hypotension at 72 h, with a risk ratio (95%CI) of 5.88 (2.08-16.67; p < 0.001). Our meta-analysis was limited by detection and performance bias, significant statistical heterogeneity and publication bias. In view of the minimal clinically important difference in postoperative pain scores, epidural analgesia was interpreted to not be clinically different to transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery. With transversus abdominis plane block, the increase in intravenous morphine-equivalent consumption at 24 h should be balanced against the decreased risk of hypotension at 72 h. In choosing between epidural analgesia and transversus abdominis plane block, potential benefits should be balanced against the reported risk of harm, although the confidence in the evidence varied, underlining the uncertainty in our estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available