4.6 Article

Epigenetically modifying the Foxp3 locus for generation of stable antigen-specific Tregs as cellular therapeutics

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 2366-2379

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15845

Keywords

basic (laboratory) research; science; immune regulation; immunosuppression; immune modulation; organ transplant in general; T cell biology

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AI129906]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) are potent immunoregulatory cells, prompting strong interests in manipulating them for therapeutic purposes. However, significant challenges remain, including their heterogeneity and functional instability. Here we focused on the inducible Tregs (iTregs) and studied whether the Foxp3 locus can be epigenetically edited ex vivo to produce stable therapeutic iTregs. Under iTreg-inducing condition where activated CD4(+) T effector cells were converted to Foxp3+ Tregs, we tested approximately 30 compounds and identified 3 chromatin-modifying chemical compounds (3C) consisting of sodium butyrate (a broad histone deacetylase inhibitor), UNC0646 (a histone methyltransferase inhibitor), and vitamin C (a TET dioxygenase co-activator), that together produced complete demethylation at the conserved noncoding sequence 2 (CNS2) region of Foxp3 locus. We found that iTregs induced in the presence of 3C (3C-iTregs) are stable, even after exposure to inflammatory cytokines. They expressed high levels of Foxp3 and exhibited potent suppressive activities both in vitro and in vivo. We showed that in models of autoimmunity and transplant rejection, adoptive transfer of antigen-specific 3C-iTregs prevented the induction of experimental autoimmune encephalitis and enabled long-term skin allograft survival. Our data demonstrate that the Foxp3 locus can be epigenetically edited ex vivo to generate stable therapeutic iTregs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available