4.3 Article

Identification and validation of microRNAs as endogenous controls for quantitative polymerase chain reaction in plasma for stable coronary artery disease

Journal

CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 694-703

Publisher

VIA MEDICA
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.2016.0109

Keywords

stable coronary artery disease; circulating microRNA; reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR); reference genes; normalization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81302883]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [14JJ4056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been proved to serve as biomarkers for diagnosis and assessment of prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is a widely-used technique to estimate expression levels of circulating miRNAs. Selection of optimal endogenous control (EC) remains critical to obtain reliable qPCR data of miRNAs expression. However, reference controls for normalization of circulating miRNA in CAD are still lacking. The purpose of this study was to identify stably expressed miRNAs to normalize RT-qPCR data derived from plasma in stable CAD. Methods: We identified 10 stably expressed candidate ECs by combining miRNA microarray screening and literature screening. These 10 candidate ECs were estimated by RT-qPCR and the data were analyzed by NormFinder and BestKeeper algorithm. Results: Two most stable ECs were identified as EC candidates and they were subsequently validated in another larger cohort. The 2 candidates were also validated by normalizing the expression levels of miR-21. In general, they were superior to the commonly used reference gene RNU6 in quantification cycle (Cq) value, stability value and normalization effect. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that miR-6090 and miR-4516 can be used as reference genes for plasma miRNA analysis in stable CAD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available