4.7 Article

Bi-allelic ADARB1 Variants Associated with Microcephaly, Intellectual Disability, and Seizures

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages 467-483

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.02.015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education Youth and Sports Czech Republic (MEYS CR) [LM2015062]
  2. Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI)
  3. JPB Foundation
  4. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration [621368]
  5. Czech Science Foundation [19-16963S]
  6. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  7. National Human Genome Research Institute
  8. National Eye Institute
  9. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [UM1 HG008900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The RNA editing enzyme ADAR2 is essential for the recoding of brain transcripts. Impaired ADAR2 editing leads to early-onset epilepsy and premature death in a mouse model. Here, we report bi-allelic variants in ADARB1, the gene encoding ADAR2, in four unrelated individuals with microcephaly, intellectual disability, and epilepsy. In one individual, a homozygous variant in one of the double-stranded RNA-binding domains (dsRBDs) was identified. In the others, variants were situated in or around the deaminase domain. To evaluate the effects of these variants on ADAR2 enzymatic activity, we performed in vitro assays with recombinant proteins in HEK293T cells and ex vivo assays with fibroblasts derived from one of the individuals. We demonstrate that these ADAR2 variants lead to reduced editing activity on a known ADAR2 substrate. We also demonstrate that one variant leads to changes in splicing of ADARB1 transcript isoforms. These findings reinforce the importance of RNA editing in brain development and introduce ADARB1 as a genetic etiology in individuals with intellectual disability, microcephaly, and epilepsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available