4.2 Article

Effect of Preveraison Water Deficits on the Yield Components of 15 Winegrape Cultivars

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages 208-221

Publisher

AMER SOC ENOLOGY VITICULTURE
DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2020.19073

Keywords

grape yield; regulated deficit irrigation; yield components

Funding

  1. American Vineyard Foundation [2014-1533]
  2. California Institute of Water Resources Joseph G. Prosser Trust [2015CA345B]
  3. Henry A. Jastro Research Award
  4. Wine Spectator Scholarship
  5. Horace O. Lanza Scholarship
  6. Adolf C. and Richie C. Heck Research Fellowship
  7. Louis R. Gomberg Scholarship
  8. C.O. Foerster Jr. Scholarship
  9. Nathan Fay Scholarship
  10. Pearl and Albert J. Winkler Scholarship in Viticulture
  11. Harold P. Olmo Scholarship
  12. Richard and Saralee Kunde Scholarship
  13. David E. Gallo Award
  14. John Ferrington Award
  15. Robert Lawrence Balzer Scholarship
  16. Curtis J. Alley Memorial Research Scholarship
  17. Leon D. Adams Research Scholarship
  18. Andre Tchelistcheff and Dr. Richard Peterson Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate information regarding crop reproductive development and yield formation in response to water deficits is needed for informed vineyard irrigation management decisions, particularly when water supply is limiting. Fifteen red winegrape cultivars grown in the San Joaquin Valley of California were subjected to two regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) treatments for four years to determine yield component responses to water deficits (no applied water) preveraison (ED) and postveraison (LD). In the fifth year, the cultivars were kept well-watered to determine carryover effects. In the first four years, early water deficits (ED) consistently and significantly reduced yields compared to the control (sustained deficit, SD; applied water at 50% of estimated crop evapotranspiration (ETc) throughout the growing season) across all years and cultivars, but the late (postveraison) deficit (LD) treatment vines were not different from the control. The reduction in yield with ED was primarily due to a significant reduction in berry fresh weight (FW) and clusters per vine, with little change in berries per cluster. Neither flowers per cluster nor percent berry set were affected by the treatments, although flowers per cluster varied significantly among cultivars. Berries per cluster increased linearly with flowers per cluster until saturation at similar to 150 berries per cluster as percent berry set declined at similar to 250 flowers per cluster. In the fifth year, yields of the two RDI treatments recovered somewhat because of increases in berry FW and a small, but significant, increase in clusters per vine. These results show that berry size, because of a reduction in FW, is the most sensitive yield component to water deficits, followed by clusters per vine and berries per cluster, with sensitivity maximum preveraison and few differences among cultivars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available