4.7 Article

Determinants of accelerated metabolomic and epigenetic aging in a UK cohort

Journal

AGING CELL
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acel.13149

Keywords

accelerated aging; affective mood disorders; DNA methylation; metabolomics; molecular biology of aging; risk factors

Funding

  1. Horizon 2020 Framework Programme [633666, 633595, 733206]
  2. Home Office [780-TETRA]
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre
  4. UK MEDical BIOinformatics Partnership [MR/L01632X/1]
  5. MRC [MR/S03658X/1, MR/L01632X/1, MR/S019669/1, UKDRI-5001, MR/L01341X/1, MR/M501669/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. UKRI [MR/S03532X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Markers of biological aging have potential utility in primary care and public health. We developed a model of age based on untargeted metabolic profiling across multiple platforms, including nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in urine and serum, within a large sample (N = 2,239) from the UK Airwave cohort. We validated a subset of model predictors in a Finnish cohort including repeat measurements from 2,144 individuals. We investigated the determinants of accelerated aging, including lifestyle and psychological risk factors for premature mortality. The metabolomic age model was well correlated with chronological age (mean r = .86 across independent test sets). Increased metabolomic age acceleration (mAA) was associated after false discovery rate (FDR) correction with overweight/obesity, diabetes, heavy alcohol use and depression. DNA methylation age acceleration measures were uncorrelated with mAA. Increased DNA methylation phenotypic age acceleration (N = 1,110) was associated after FDR correction with heavy alcohol use, hypertension and low income. In conclusion, metabolomics is a promising approach for the assessment of biological age and appears complementary to established epigenetic clocks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available