Journal
AGING & MENTAL HEALTH
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 991-998Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1746740
Keywords
Cognitive stimulation therapy; dementia; group therapy; qualitative methods
Categories
Funding
- University College London as part of a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology thesis project
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study explored the experiences of group interactions in CST and MCST groups, identifying therapeutic advantages in the group format. It also highlighted challenges related to the group format and suggested further research to explore the relationship between group interactions and clinical outcomes.
Objectives:Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) is an evidence-based group intervention shown to improve cognition and quality of life in dementia and is widely implemented across the NHS. However, no attempt has been made to understand the possible advantages, and/or disadvantages, of delivering CST in a group format. The main aim of the present study was to explore experiences of group interactions in CST and longer-term maintenance CST (MCST) groups. Method:A total of twenty-one semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted across four separate groups delivered in London, the East Midlands, South West and South East of England; including two CST and two MCST groups. Group members with mild to moderate dementia and facilitators from these groups were interviewed. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data using NVivo software. Results:The final analysis identified six themes: 'benefits and challenges of group expression', 'importance of companionship and getting to know others, 'togetherness and shared identity', 'group entertainment', 'group support' and 'cognitive stimulation through the group'. The inter-connecting relationship between these themes are synthesised and summarised. Conclusion:Findings support the notion that therapeutic advantages inherent to the group format exist in group-based CST. New insights into the challenges related to a group format are also highlighted and discussed. Future research may benefit from exploring the relationship between the identified experiences of group interactions and clinical outcomes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available