4.5 Article

Frequency drift insensitive broadband wireless power transfer system

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2020.153121

Keywords

Resonate frequency deviation; Transfer coefficient; Wireless power transfer

Funding

  1. Key Science and Technology Project of Henan Province of China [182102210080]
  2. Foundation for Key Scholar by the Henan Province of China [2017GGJS040]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1904182]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The resonant frequency of coils in a four-coil magnetic coupling resonance wireless power transfer (MCRWPT) system has a direct impact on transfer coefficient. For efficient power transfer, most of the systems operate at high-Q resonant state, causing a narrow bandwidth and reducing the system tolerance to resonant frequency deviation. To deal with the problem, a four-coil MCR-WPT system characterized with broadband performance is investigated. Based on the equivalent circuit, the transfer coefficient and the input impedance are firstly calculated. The transfer characteristic at different resonant frequency under different transfer distances is discussed. By comparing the number and variance of the extreme values of transfer coefficient under different resonant frequencies, the resonant frequency for excellent broadband transmission is determined. To validate the broadband performance, frequency drift caused by capacitance variations is investigated at the resonant frequency of 19 MHz under the transfer distance of 45 mm. The results indicate that the MRC-WPT system generally maintains broadband transmission and the transfer coefficient at the excitation frequency of 19 MHz remains above 0.9 when the resonant frequency is deviated. Experiments have been performed to validate the excellent broadband performance. The results are generally consistent with the simulation analysis. (C) 2020 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available