4.5 Article

Multiplex PCR development for the differential detection of four medically important echinostomes (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) in Thailand

Journal

ACTA TROPICA
Volume 204, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105304

Keywords

Echinostomiasis; NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1; Molecular differentiation; Specific primer

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund, Commission on Higher Education
  2. Mahasarakham University (TRF-CHE-MSU) [MRG5480009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four species of echinostomes, Echinostoma revolutum (Froelich, 1802), Echinostoma ilocanum (Garrison, 1908), Hypoderaeum conoideum (Bloch, 1872) Dietz, 1909, and Artyfechinostomum malayanum (Leiper, 1911) Mendheim, 1943 commonly infect humans in Thailand, but their eggs present similar morphologies resulting in difficult differentiation for diagnosis. Present molecular methods have a great potential to provide superior detection/diagnosis. DNA sequences, especially the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (ND1) gene, have already been used to differentiate among echinostomes; thus, we aimed to develop species-specific primers for the differential detection of four medically important echinostomes by multiplex PCR. The species-specific reverse primers and a forward primer were based on variable regions and conserved regions of the ND1 gene, respectively. Four reverse primers and a forward primer were combined in a multiplex PCR reaction to amplify the ND1 fragment. Different ND1 fragment sizes were amplified: 108, 209, 384 and 419 bp of E. revolutum H. conoideum, E. ilocanum and A. malayanum, respectively. Specificity was tested with other medically important parasite DNA; no cross-reaction occurred. Sensitivity ranged between 0.1 and 0.05 ng. The species-specific primers developed in this study could be of further use in differential diagnosis for these medically important echinostomes infection in human and animal hosts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available