4.8 Article

Controllable Synthesis of Peapod-like Sb@C and Corn-like C@Sb Nanotubes for Sodium Storage

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 5728-5737

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c00366

Keywords

antimony; N-doped carbon nanotubes; anode materials; sodium-ion batteries; full cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21805261, 21701158]
  2. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX201700214]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T110995, 2018M631101]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [B2015006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antimony (Sb) is regarded as an attractive anode material for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) due to its high theoretical capacity of 660 mAh g(-1). Combining Sb with carbonaceous materials has been considered as an effective way to resolve the serious volume expansion issues. Sb/C composites mainly consist of two types, that is, Sb confined inside a carbon matrix and Sb deposited on the surface of a carbon matrix, and both have shown superior sodium storage performance. However, which structure is more beneficial for achieving high electrochemical performance is still unclear. In this work, peapod-like Sb@C and corn-like C@Sb nanotubes are synthesized via a nanoconfined galvanic replacement reaction and used as model materials for sodium storage to explore the above issue. When evaluated as anode materials for SIBs, the peapod-like Sb@C shows a higher rate capability and a significantly better long-term cycling stability compared to those of the corn-like C@Sb. Electrochemical analysis reveals that the peapod-like Sb@C exhibits faster Na+ and electron transport kinetics and higher proportions of surface capacitive contributions. These results demonstrate the structural superiority of the nanoconfined structure and provide valuable information for the rational design and construction of Sb-based anode materials for high-performance electrochemical energy storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available