4.8 Review

Covalent Organic Frameworks: Emerging Organic Solid Materials for Energy and Electrochemical Applications

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 25, Pages 27821-27852

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c06267

Keywords

covalent organic frameworks; structural design and synthesis; electrochemical applications; energy conversion and storage; porous crystalline materials

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201808260042]
  2. Future Material Discovery Program [2016M3D1A1027666]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B3009135]
  4. Army Research Office [W911NF1910340]
  5. IIN Postdoctoral Fellowship
  6. Northwestern University International Institute for Nanotechnology
  7. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0208200, 2016YFB0700600, 2015CB659300]
  8. NSFC [21872069, 51761135104, 21573108]
  9. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180008]
  10. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [14380188]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs), materials constructed from organic building blocks joined by robust covalent bonds, have emerged as attractive materials in the context of electrochemical applications because of their high, intrinsic porosities and crystalline frameworks, as well as their ability to be tuned across two- and three-dimensions by the judicious selection of building blocks. Because of the recent and rapid development of this field, we have summarized COFs employed for electrochemical applications, such as batteries and capacitors, water splitting, solar cells, and sensors, with an emphasis on the structural design and resulting performance of the targeted electrochemical system. Overall, we anticipate this review will stimulate the design and synthesis of the next generation of COFs for use in electrochemical applications and beyond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available