4.8 Article

Manipulation of Electron Transfer between Pd and TiO2 for Improved Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Performance

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 24, Pages 27037-27044

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c03742

Keywords

palladium; titanium dioxide; cube; facet-dependent; hydrogen evolution reaction

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0406000]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [21875137, 51521004, 51420105009]
  3. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2019-01-07-00-02-E00069]
  4. 111 Project [B16032]
  5. Center of Hydrogen Science and Joint Research Center for Clean Energy Materials at Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The urgent need of catalysts with improved performances toward the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is still one of the crucial issues for the water splitting electrocatalysis. Herein, we exhibit that the HER activity of the Pd nanocubes could be improved by selecting the appropriately shaped titania nanocrystals as support. In particular, we used Pd nanoparticles with (100)-facet exposed to show that the HER performance of Pd cubes can be improved in both acidic and alkaline electrolyte media when combined on the anatase TiO2 nanocrystals. Furthermore, we have also investigated the facet effect of TiO2 on the performance in detail, which indicated stronger catalytic activity when (001)-TiO2 was used rather than (mix 101/001)-TiO2 and (101)-TiO2. The electron-transfer-induced improvement of HER activity of Pd/TiO2 was assessed by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). Thereafter, the combined support materials with suitable facet exposed can give an additional adjusting path to regulate the HER activities of Pd nanocatalysts, which henceforth can further contribute to a novel way for tuning other catalysts with good electrocatalytic properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available