4.8 Article

Quantitative Determination of Dark and Light-Activated Antimicrobial Activity of Poly(Phenylene Ethynylene), Polythiophene, and Oligo(Phenylene Ethynylene) Electrolytes

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 19, Pages 21322-21329

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c02939

Keywords

antimicrobial polyelectrolytes; conjugated polyelectrolytes; oligomeric electrolytes; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus; poly-3-hexyl-thiophene polyelectrolytes; poly(phenylene)-ethynylene polyelectrolytes

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0016353]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1R21NS111267-01]
  3. Welch Foundation
  4. Welch Chair [AX-004520110629]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0016353] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Much recent effort has been directed toward the development of novel antimicrobial materials able to defeat new and antibiotic resistant pathogens. In this report, we study the efficacy of cationic poly(phenylene ethynylene), polythiophene, and oligo(phenylene ethynylene) electrolytes against laboratory strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. The focus of the study is to quantitatively evaluate the speed and extent of dark and light-activated antimicrobial activity. Using cell plating with serial dilutions, we determined that planktonic bacteria suspensions exposed to the antimicrobials (at 10 mu g/mL) result in several log kills at 10 min both in the dark and under UV irradiation (360 nm) for all eight synthetic antimicrobials. However, there are significant differences in the ease of killing the different pathogens. In most trials, there is significantly greater killing under light-irradiation, indicating these materials may be used as versatile disinfectants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available