4.8 Article

Enhanced Acetone Oxidation over the CeO2/Co3O4 Catalyst Derived from Metal-Organic Frameworks

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 25, Pages 28139-28147

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c04904

Keywords

MOFs; VOCs; catalytic oxidation; cobalt-cerium; stability

Funding

  1. Natural National Science Foundation of China [21503144, 21690083]
  2. Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technique [15JCQNJC08500, 16JCQNJC05400]
  3. National Engineering Laboratory for Mobile Source Emission Control Technology of China [NELMS2017A03]
  4. Tianjin Research Program of Ecological Environmental Treatment [18ZXSZSF00210, 18ZXSZSF00060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel CeO2/Co3O4 catalyst with a high catalytic activity has been designed and prepared by pyrolysis of metal-organic frameworks, and its catalytic performance was evaluated by the acetone catalytic oxidation reaction. The Co3O4-M catalyst with T-90 at 194 degrees C was prepared by pyrolysis of the MOF-71 precursor, which was 56 degrees C lower than that of commercial Co3O4 (250 degrees C). By the addition of cerium to the MOF-71 precursor, an enhanced CeO2/Co3O4 catalyst with T90 at 180 degrees C was prepared. Importantly, the CeO2/Co3O4 catalyst exhibited superior stability for acetone oxidation. After 10 cycle tests, the conversion could also be maintained at 97% for at least 100 h with slight activity loss. Characterization studies were used to investigate the influence of cerium doping on the property of the catalyst. The results showed that addition of cerium could facilitate the expansion of the surface area and enhance the porous structure and reducibility at low temperature. Furthermore, the surface ratio of Co3+/Co2+ and mobile oxygen obviously improved with the addition of cerium. Therefore, the metal oxides prepared by this method have potential for the elimination of acetone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available