4.5 Article

Optimization of the extraction of polyphenols and antioxidant capacities from two types of Solanum gilo Raddi using response surface methodology

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2019.100238

Keywords

Dietary source; Ethanolic extract; Extraction time; 'jilo'; Medicinal plant; Phenols

Categories

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  2. Minas Gerais State Research Foundation (FAPEMIG - Fundacao de Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais)
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES - Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior) Brazil [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solanum gilo Radii is traditionally used in cooking by the local people of Brazil. The aim this work was to investigate the influence of extraction methods, ethanolic degree, and extraction time on of total phenolic compounds (TPC), flavonoids, and the antioxidant potential of immature fruits of two types of S. gilo, Long Light Green (LLG) and Spherical Dark Green (SDG), using response surface methodology (RSM). The dried and pulverized immature fruits were submitted to turbo-extraction, dynamic maceration, and sonication with different ethanolic degree (96, 70, and 40 %) and extraction times (10, 20, and 30 min). The experimental design approach using RSM was successfully applied for predicting dry residue, phenolics and flavonoids contents and antioxidant activities from the dry fruits of two types of S. gilo. The results showed that the most important variable in the extraction procedure was the ethanolic degree and the most promise type of S. gilo was SDG. The best ethanol degree was 61 % for TPC, 79 % TFF, 59 % TAC, and 65 % DPPH. These results demonstrate the potential benefit of S. gilo as an important dietary source of phenolic antioxidants for human health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available