4.6 Article

One-Step Synthesis of Metal-Modified Nanomagnetic Materials and Their Application in the Removal of Chlortetracycline

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages 5116-5125

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04106

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Projects of Jilin Province (Major Scientific and Technological Projects of Pollution Prevention and Control and Ecological Restoration in Liaohe River Basin, Jilin Province)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic nanomaterials are promising heterogeneous catalysts for environmental applications. According to X-ray diffraction, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method, scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and vibrating-sample magnetometer, a kind of copper-modified nanomagnetic material (Cu-nFe(3)O(4)) was successfully prepared by a one-step synthesis method. Among them, compared with the two-step synthesis method of Cu-nFe(3)O(4) and Cu-nFe(3)O(4), Cu-nFe(3)O(4) has the best effect on chlortetracycline (CTC) removal. The batch study results indicate that the maximum removal of chlortetracycline is 99.0% at a dosage = 2.0 g L-1, copper loading = 0.8 mM, and C-0= 100 mg L-1 at the optimum conditions within 90 min. The effects of humic acids (HA), NO3-, Cl-, CO32-, and PO43- on the CTC removal by Cu-nFe(3)O(4 )are also investigated. Repeated experiments were performed on the prepared Cu-nFe(3)O(4), indicating that Cu-nFe(3)O(4) has good recyclability. The kinetics of the Cu-nFe(3)O(4) removal of CTC was investigated, indicating that the reaction conformed to the double constant model and the reaction is mainly dominated by a chemical reaction with physical adsorption. Finally, the mechanism of the CTC removal by Cu-nFe(3)O(4) in a heterogeneous environment was clarified. This study aims to provide an experimental basis for the environmental application of Cu-nFe(3)O(4).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available