4.7 Article

Effects of Light and Daytime on the Regulation of Chitosan-Induced Stomatal Responses and Defence in Tomato Plants

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants9010059

Keywords

chitosan; chlorophyll a fluorescence; nitric oxide; reactive oxygen species; stomata

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary - NKFIH [NKFIH FK 124871]
  2. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities [UNKP-18-3-I-SZTE-17, UNKP-19-4-SZTE-86]
  3. University of Szeged [4443]
  4. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Closure of stomata upon pathogenesis is among the earliest plant immune responses. However, our knowledge is very limited about the dependency of plant defence responses to chitosan (CHT) on external factors (e.g., time of the day, presence, or absence of light) in intact plants. CHT induced stomatal closure before dark/light transition in leaves treated at 17:00 hrs and stomata were closed at 09:00 hrs in plants treated at dawn and in the morning. CHT was able to induce generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in guard cells in the first part of the light phase, but significant nitric oxide production was observable only at 15:00 hrs. The actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (Phi(PSII)) decreased upon CHT treatments at 09:00 hrs in guard cells but it declined only at dawn in mesophyll cells after the treatment at 17:00 hrs. Expression of Pathogenesis-related 1 (PR1) and Ethylene Response Factor 1 were already increased at dawn in the CHT-treated leaves but PR1 expression was inhibited in the dark. CHT-induced systemic response was also observed in the distal leaves of CHT-treated ones. Our results suggest a delayed and daytime-dependent defence response of tomato plants after CHT treatment at night and under darkness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available