4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Ilmenite as low-cost catalyst for producer gas quality improvement from a biomass pilot-scale gasifier

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 325-330

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.08.063

Keywords

Biomass; Bubbling fluidized bed; Catalyst; Gasification; Ilmenite

Categories

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
  2. CESAM, Portugal [UID/AMB/50017/2019]
  3. FCT/MCTES through national funds
  4. FEDER
  5. Navigator Company, Portugal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, in-situ application of natural occurring ilmenite (FeTiO3) for upgrading the producer gas from a pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed gasifier was performed and its influence on the gas characteristics and gasifier performance was analyzed. Without using ilmenite, the producer gas average composition (volumetric basis, dry gas) was 15.2% CO, 7.6% H-2, 3.8% CH4 and 15.6% CO2, with 0.50 H-2:CO molar ratio and 5.0 MJ/Nm(3) lower heating value. For this condition, 1.6 Nm(3) gas/kg biomass (dry basis) specific dry gas production, 44.5% cold gas efficiency and 68.4% carbon conversion efficiency were attained. Using ilmenite as catalyst, the producer gas average composition (volumetric basis, dry gas) was 13.9% CO, 11.7% H-2, 4.0% CH4 and 17.9% CO2, with 0.84 H-2:CO molar ratio and 5.1 MJ/Nm(3) lower heating value. For this condition, 1.7 Nm(3) gas/kg biomass (dry basis) specific dry gas production, 49.8% cold gas efficiency and 75.5% carbon conversion efficiency were attained. Thus, in-situ application of ilmenite generally improved the gasifier performance and induced an increase of H-2 concentration and H-2:CO molar ratio in the producer gas of 35.1% and 40.7%, respectively, improving its suitability for advanced gas applications that require high H-2:CO ratios, such as liquid fuels and chemicals synthesis. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available