4.6 Article

Comparative Genomic Analysis Confirms Five Genetic Populations of the Select Agent, Rathayibacter toxicus

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8030366

Keywords

Rathayibacter toxicus; annual ryegrass toxicity; flood plain staggers; Stuart's range syndrome; comparative genomics; populations

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centres Program, Canberra, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rathayibacter toxicus is a Gram-positive, nematode-vectored bacterium that infects several grass species in the family Poaceae. Unique in its genus, R. toxicus has the smallest genome, possesses a complete CRISPR-Cas system, a vancomycin-resistance cassette, produces tunicamycin, a corynetoxin responsible for livestock deaths in Australia, and is designated a Select Agent in the United States. In-depth, genome-wide analyses performed in this study support the previously designated five genetic populations, with a core genome comprising approximately 80% of the genome for all populations. Results varied as a function of the type of analysis and when using different bioinformatics tools for the same analysis; e.g., some programs failed to identify specific genomic regions that were actually present. The software variance highlights the need to verify bioinformatics results by additional methods; e.g., PCR, mapping genes to genomes, use of multiple algorithms). These analyses suggest the following relationships among populations: RT-IV <-> RT-I <-> RT-II <-> RT-III <-> RT-V, with RT-IV and RT-V being the most unrelated. This is the most comprehensive analysis of R. toxicus that included populations RT-I and RT-V. Future studies require underrepresented populations and more recent isolates from varied hosts and geographic locations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available