4.6 Article

Characterization of Ocular Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Non-Contact Lens Related Keratitis Patients from South India

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020260

Keywords

type III secretion; antibiotic resistance; Pseudomonas; biofilm; pyoverdine; swarming

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council, UK [MR/S004688/1]
  2. Humane Research Trust [145355]
  3. MRC [MR/S004688/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P. aeruginosa is the most common Gram-negative organism causing bacterial keratitis. Pseudomonas utilizes various virulence mechanisms to adhere and colonize in the host tissue. In the present study, we examined virulence factors associated with thirty-four clinical P. aeruginosa isolates collected from keratitis patients seeking care at L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad. The virulence-associated genes in all the isolates were genotyped and characteristics such as antibiotic susceptibility, biofilm formation, swarming motility, pyoverdine production and cell cytotoxicity were analyzed. All the isolates showed the presence of genes related to biofilm formation, alkaline proteases and elastases; however, there was a difference in the presence of genes related to the type III secretion system (T3SS). A higher prevalence of exoU+ genotype was noted in the drug-resistant isolates. All the isolates were capable of forming biofilms and more than 70% of the isolates showed good swarming motility. Pyoverdine production was not associated with the T3SS genotype. In the cytotoxicity assay, the presence of exoS, exoU or both resulted in higher cytotoxicity compared to the absence of both the genes. Overall, our results suggest that the T3SS profile is a good indicator of P. aeruginosa virulence characteristics and the isolates lacking the effector genes may have evolved alternate mechanisms of colonization in the host.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available