4.6 Article

Haloglomus irregulare gen. nov., sp. nov., a New Halophilic Archaeon Isolated from a Marine Saltern

Journal

MICROORGANISMS
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020206

Keywords

haloarchaea; hypersaline habitats; salterns; taxonomy; ecology; Haloglomus

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), European (FEDER) funds [CGL2017-83385-P]
  2. Junta de Andalucia (Spain), European (FEDER) funds [BIO-213, US-1263771]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A halophilic archaeal strain, designated F16-60(T), was isolated from Isla Cristina marine saltern in Huelva, Spain. Cells were pleomorphic, irregular, non-motile, and Gram-stain-negative. It produced red-pigmented colonies on agar plates. Strain F16-60(T) was extremely halophilic (optimum at 30% (w/v) NaCl) and neutrophilic (optimum pH 7.5). Phylogenetic tree reconstructions based on 16S rRNA and rpoB' gene sequences revealed that strain F16-60(T) was distinct from species of the related genera Natronomonas, Halomarina, and Halomicrobium, of the order Halobacteriales. The polar lipids are phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylglycerol phosphate methyl ester (PGP-Me), phosphatidylglycerol sulfate (PGS), and one glycolipid chromatographically identical to sulfated mannosyl glucosyl diether (S-DGD-1). The DNA G+C content is 68.0 mol%. The taxonomic study, based on a combination of phylogenetic, genomic, chemotaxonomic, and phenotypic analyses, suggest that strain F16-60(T) (= CECT 9635(T) = JCM 33318(T)), represents a novel species of a new genus within the family Haloarculaceae and the order Halobacteriales, for which the name Haloglomus irregulare gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. Metagenomic fragment recruitment analysis revealed the worldwide distribution of members of this genus and suggested the existence of other closely related species to be isolated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available