4.7 Article

Evaluation of Immunization Services for Children of Migrant Workers Along Thailand-Myanmar Border: Compliance with Global Vaccine Action Plan (2011-2020)

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8010068

Keywords

immunization; migrant; Thailand-Myanmar border; global vaccine action plan; expanded program on immunization; vaccination coverage

Funding

  1. Thailand Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  2. Thai Health Promotion Foundation
  3. Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunization is a core component of the human right to health. However, accessibility to the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) might be difficult among migrant children. This study aims to assess the vaccination coverage of migrant children under a mobile immunization program, initiated by the Thai government in 2014. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted in five districts along the Thailand-Myanmar border during July-December 2018. The immunization history during their first year of life was obtained. Focus group discussions were conducted among stakeholders to explore their satisfaction toward the immunization service. Mothers/guardians of 1707 migrant children participated in the survey, with a 71% response rate. The vaccination coverage increased during 2014-2017. The highest vaccination coverage was observed for Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine, with 83.2% coverage in 2017. The vaccination coverage of three doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine and Hepatitis B vaccine and oral polio vaccine increased from 34.8% in 2014 to 56.3% in 2017. For measles-containing vaccine, the vaccination coverage increased from 32.4% in 2014 to 54.6% in 2017. Overall, all stakeholders were satisfied with the immunization service. Increased workload and communication barriers were the main factors that influenced the satisfaction toward the immunization program.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available