4.1 Article

Drug Target Engagement Using Coupled Cellular Thermal Shift Assay-Acoustic Reverse-Phase Protein Array

Journal

SLAS DISCOVERY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 207-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1177/2472555219897256

Keywords

target engagement; CETSA; RPPA; acoustic transfer; drug discovery; nanovolume; insulin-degrading enzyme

Funding

  1. INSERM, University of Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Region Nord Pas de Calais, FEDER [0823007, 0823008, 07-CPER 009-01, 2007-0172-02-CPER/3]
  2. European Union under European Regional Fund (ERDF), by Hauts-de-France Regional Council [17003781]
  3. MEL [2016_ESR_05]
  4. Institut Universitaire de France
  5. [2017-R3-CTRL]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the last 5 years, cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA), a technology based on ligand-induced changes in protein thermal stability, has been increasingly used in drug discovery to address the fundamental question of whether drug candidates engage their intended target in a biologically relevant setting. To analyze lysates from cells submitted to increasing temperature, the detection and quantification of the remaining soluble protein can be achieved using quantitative mass spectrometry, Western blotting, or AlphaScreen techniques. Still, these approaches can be time- and cell-consuming. To cope with limitations of throughput and protein amount requirements, we developed a new coupled assay combining the advantages of a nanoacoustic transfer system and reverse-phase protein array technology within CETSA experiments. We validated the technology to assess engagement of inhibitors of insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), an enzyme involved in diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. CETSA-acoustic reverse-phase protein array (CETSA-aRPPA) allows simultaneous analysis of many conditions and drug-target engagement with a small sample size, in a rapid, cost-effective, and biological material-saving manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available