4.6 Article

Cytosine and adenine base editing of the brain, liver, retina, heart and skeletal muscle of mice via adeno-associated viruses

Journal

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 97-110

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-019-0501-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [UG3 TR002636, U01 AI142756, RM1 HG009490, R01 EB022376, R35 GM118062]
  2. St. Jude Collaborative Research Consortium
  3. DARPA [HR0011-17-2-0049]
  4. Ono Pharma Foundation
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  7. Harvard Center for Biological Imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The success of base editors for the study and treatment of genetic diseases depends on the ability to deliver them in vivo to the relevant cell types. Delivery via adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) is limited by AAV packaging capacity, which precludes the use of full-length base editors. Here, we report the application of dual AAVs for the delivery of split cytosine and adenine base editors that are then reconstituted by trans-splicing inteins. Optimized dual AAVs enable in vivo base editing at therapeutically relevant efficiencies and dosages in the mouse brain (up to 59% of unsorted cortical tissue), liver (38%), retina (38%), heart (20%) and skeletal muscle (9%). We also show that base editing corrects, in mouse brain tissue, a mutation that causes Niemann-Pick disease type C (a neurodegenerative ataxia), slowing down neurodegeneration and increasing lifespan. The optimized delivery vectors should facilitate the efficient introduction of targeted point mutations into multiple tissues of therapeutic interest. Optimized adeno-associated viruses delivering split cytosine base editors and adenine base editors with trans-splicing inteins can edit brain, liver, retina, heart and skeletal-muscle tissues at therapeutically relevant efficiencies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available