4.6 Article

Recognition of Gait Phases with a Single Knee Electrogoniometer: A Deep Learning Approach

Journal

ELECTRONICS
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics9020355

Keywords

knee angle; deep learning; neural networks; gait-phase classification; electrogoniometer; EMG sensors; walking; gait-event detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial neural networks were satisfactorily implemented for assessing gait events from different walking data. This study aims to propose a novel approach for recognizing gait phases and events, based on deep-learning analysis of only sagittal knee-joint angle measured by a single electrogoniometer per leg. Promising classification/prediction performances have been previously achieved by surface-EMG studies; thus, a further aim is to test if adding electrogoniometer data could improve classification performances of state-of-the-art methods. Gait data are measured in about 10,000 strides from 23 healthy adults, during ground walking. A multi-layer perceptron model is implemented, composed of three hidden layers and a one-dimensional output. Classification/prediction accuracy is tested vs. ground truth represented by foot-floor-contact signals, through samples acquired from subjects not seen during training phase. Average classification-accuracy of 90.6 +/- 2.9% and mean absolute value (MAE) of 29.4 +/- 13.7 and 99.5 +/- 28.9 ms in assessing heel-strike and toe-off timing are achieved in unseen subjects. Improvement of classification-accuracy (four points) and reduction of MAE (at least 35%) are achieved when knee-angle data are used to enhance sEMG-data prediction. Comparison of the two approaches shows as the reduction of set-up complexity implies a worsening of mainly toe-off prediction. Thus, the present electrogoniometer approach is particularly suitable for the classification tasks where only heel-strike event is involved, such as stride recognition, stride-time computation, and identification of toe walking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available